Intel·graphics card
Intel Arc A770
Based on 12 credible posts from Hacker News. 4 filtered out as bot-like or off-topic.
Low confidenceFew owner reviews so far, so this score can still move a lot. How we score
Scored September 27, 2026
We may earn a commission from this link. It never affects the score.
Owner reviews
Overall owner mood
Owners mostly like it, with reservations: 58% of 12 reviews are positive, 34% mixed, and only 8% negative. Praise centers on performance and price & value.
What owners like
Performance praised by 2 owners
“Decent performance.”
Price & value praised by 2 owners
“That will be the cheapest way to run my tools, since you get 16GB for $300.”
Software & AI praised by 2 owners
“experiences, but Intel I'm bullish on the product seems like by far the bang for the buck once software lands.”
What owners complain about
Nothing two or more owners agree on yet.
What owners talk about
- Performance2 praise · 1 complain
- Price & value2 praise · 0 complain
- Software & AI2 praise · 0 complain
Built from the reviews themselves — every quote links to the owner who wrote it.
Full text of every credible post we scored. Bot-like and off-topic comments are hidden.
Nice article. I'd add that I have 8k@60 supported when using RX 6600XT and Arc A770.
[...] One of my brothers has a PC I built for him, specced out with an Intel Core i5 13400f CPU and an Intel Arc A770 GPU, and it still works great for his needs in 2025. [...]
I've been pretty happy with my Arc A770 LE (16 GB). The drivers were rough at launch, but they've gotten much better, and at the time it was the best performance $350 could buy.
[...] I'm also hoping that Intel puts out an Arc A770 class upgrade in their B-series line-up. My workstation and my kids' playroom gaming computer both have A770's, and they've been really amazing for the price I paid, $269 and $190. My triple screen racing sim has an RX 7900 GRE ($499), and of the three the GRE has surprisingly been the least consistently stable (e.g. driver timeouts, crashes). Granted, I came into the new Intel GPU game after they'd gone through 2 solid years of driver quality hell, but I've been really pleased with Intel's uncharacteristic focus and pace of improvement in both the hardware and especially the software. [...]
[...] That ranges from Minecraft to (apparently the most graphically intensive game I own) The Talos Principle. [...] Now I finally have a bleeding-edge-ish Sparkle Arc A770, but that's only because I wanted to run a shader coding event and didn't want to force other people to care about the server having a behind-the-curve GPU.
[...] However, I had a third option, which I took: I bought a working NVidia card, put my AMD card in my attic, swore off AMD GPUs and ROCm forever, and began warn other people against ever relying on AMD. [...] Now, my software is tied to CUDA. Others are building more on top if it. If people want to run my software (or by proxy, and software which uses my software as a platform), they have more-or-less the same option if they accidentally bought AMD. [...] Right now, I'm just waiting for Arc A770 support to improve, so I can also support Intel. That will be the cheapest way to run my tools, since you get 16GB for $300. [...]
[...] Intel has a history of getting this type of software working. [...] Arc A770 seems like by far the bang for the buck once software lands. [...] Decent performance. [...]
I suspect there are a few issues: 1) NVidia drivers had a lot of secret sauce to give high performance. [...] Arc A770 gives 16gb for <$300. [...]
I bought an Arc A770 expecting that this feature would materialise based on it being available on other contemporary Intel GPUs, but it never did. Does the B70 definitely support SR-IOV from day one?
I have an Arc A770 and it seems to work fine so far... [...]
[...] Intel CPU & ARC A770 dGPU) connected to a TV that just runs Steam and Batocera with 4x USB 8BitDo controllers attached. [...]
[...] Arc A770 seems to provide 16GB for <$300, which seems awesome. [...]
The claims, and the evidence
What the brand claims
No published claims on file for this product yet.
What owners report
“[...] That ranges from Minecraft to (apparently the most graphically intensive game I own) The Talos Principle. [...] Now I finally have a bleeding-edge-ish Sparkle Arc A770, but that's only because I wanted to run a shader coding event and didn't want to force other people to care about the server having a behind-the-curve GPU.”
“Nice article. I'd add that I have 8k@60 supported when using RX 6600XT and Arc A770.”
“[...] However, I had a third option, which I took: I bought a working NVidia card, put my AMD card in my attic, swore off AMD GPUs and ROCm forever, and began warn other people against ever relying on AMD. [...] Now, my software is tied to CUDA. Others are building more on top if it. If people want to run my software (or by proxy, and software which uses my software as a platform), they have more-or-less the same option if they accidentally bought AMD. [...] Right now, I'm just waiting for Arc A770 support to improve, so I can also support Intel. That will be the cheapest way to run my tools, since you get 16GB for $300. [...]”
“I bought an Arc A770 expecting that this feature would materialise based on it being available on other contemporary Intel GPUs, but it never did. Does the B70 definitely support SR-IOV from day one?”
Common Intel Arc A770 problems
Issues at least two owners independently report.
No recurring complaint pattern found across the reviews analyzed. That's a genuinely good sign — it means owners aren't converging on the same problem.